Comments on: FuckingWebBrowser /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/ Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:54:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.7 By: Diseño Web Manizales /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-176 Wed, 02 May 2012 15:56:57 +0000 http://fuckingsound.com/?p=85#comment-176 Diseño Web Manizales…

[…]- – – – – – – – – M I C H A E L – C H I N E N – – – – – – – » FuckingWebBrowser[…]…

]]> By: robermann /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:24:04 +0000 http://fuckingsound.com/?p=85#comment-10 Here a “similar in spirit” experiment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Zs0Mi6Tndk

Every thousandth Java istruction triggers an enveloped oscillation (of 100 ms), with each instruction having a different frequency. They are finally added and reverberated.
Here the source code: http://codesounding.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/codesounding/CodeSounding/trunk/jsyn/instrSrc/GrainSkipperProcessor.java?revision=342&view=markup

]]> By: santuy /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:01:13 +0000 http://fuckingsound.com/?p=85#comment-9 khankir chele ra website preparew korar ar kichu pao ni????????????????????????????????????

]]> By: slaner /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:37:54 +0000 http://fuckingsound.com/?p=85#comment-8 This music sounds like codesounding’s one, when running into JACK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ffzn3HvEM

]]> By: mike /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:10:17 +0000 http://fuckingsound.com/?p=85#comment-7 close – the basic sonification scheme for FuckingWebBrowser is pretty simple. It just takes a newly allocated, uninitialized array of floats and pushes it onto the soundcard using portaudio, trimming the floats that are greater than 1.0 by dividing by FLT_MAX.
There is rarely The actual array is larger than the portaudio buffer, and randomization is used to defeat obvious periodicity due to the portaudio callback buffer size. FuckingFucker uses a fairly different scheme, since it’s not just about memory, but actual instructions.

]]> By: slaner /2010/02/22/fuckingwebbrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:51:18 +0000 http://fuckingsound.com/?p=85#comment-6 Cool! How is the memory address turned into sound? Is it a simple “numeric to sample” conversion?

]]>